Thursday, September 07, 2006

New York / New Orleans link

What this article says about New York's shifting population and its link to 9-11 is important to consider when you think about how New Orleans's population will undergo (and is undergoing at this very moment) the exact same thing in the coming years.

Old New Yorkers, Newer Ones, and a Line Etched by a Day of Disaster

Published: September 7, 2006

Five years ago, on Sept. 11, 2001, terrorists crashed two airliners into the World Trade Center. Downtown smelled like Coke cans and hair on fire. It was televised live.


Fred R. Conrad/The New York Times

William Stockbridge, a finance executive, was working downtown during the attack. "It's like someone who has been in a war zone. It's different."

Fred R. Conrad/The New York Times

Deenah Vollmer, who moved to the city last year. "I'm amazed because it was such a big event, and people never mention it."

Fred R. Conrad/The New York Times

Laura Bassett, who moved to the city from North Carolina after 2001. "I've been told that I just don't get it and that I could never understand what it was like to be there in New York on Sept. 11."

In New York City, 2,749 people were killed. About eight million remained. Since that day, the numbers have changed.

The population grew by more than 134,000 from 2000 to 2005, the city’s latest Planning Department calculations show. In that time, 645,416 babies were born and 304,773 people died. A half-million more people came from other countries than departed for them, and 800,000 more people left for the 50 states than came wide-eyed from them.

The meaning in the math is that today a great many New Yorkers lack firsthand knowledge of the city’s critical modern moment.

Five years on, New York is a city of newcomers and survivors. And between them runs a line. The line makes for no conflict, no discernible tension; it works a quieter breach.

Borne of the routine comings and goings of urban life, of births and deaths, the line divides views of a singular moment. Across the line, consummately familiar events can appear contorted.

On one side, the newcomer side, a man seeks accounts of that day; on the other side a man withholds his account. On the newcomer side, a woman visits the absent towers to feel some connection; on the other side a woman feels connected, and then some.

On the side of those who lived in New York, you can share a sense of trauma both layered and ill-defined.

“It’s like someone who has been in a war zone,” said William Stockbridge, 50, a finance executive who was working downtown during the attack. “It’s different.”

On the other side, you can feel like the new boyfriend at your girlfriend’s family reunion the year somebody died — somebody young, somebody you never met.

“You feel like you’re on the outside,” said Matthew Molnar, 26, a waiter in Williamsburg, Brooklyn, who lived in Middlesex County, N.J., in 2001. “You feel like you missed out on a little bit of history.”

Newcomers and survivors: those terms ring harsh and blunt only because the line is so often unspoken. It runs soundless and invisible down Broadway from Harlem over the Williamsburg Bridge out to Coney Island and to Fresh Kills, up past the airports across the Grand Concourse into Yankee Stadium, through the bleachers where you can’t drink beer anymore and up out of the park into the nighttime sky.

The line flashes into view on the city streets for moments at a time. When jet fighters buzz the skyscrapers for Fleet Week, some of the people below — the ones who were here on Sept. 11 — flinch. More frequently, though, the line operates beneath the surface of conversations, of interactions, of transactions, of life. The line controls small things, controls the way people react to the phrase “and then Sept. 11 happened,” as though a date on the calendar could “happen.”

The line’s contours emerge in conversations. Ask about the attack, and people will describe a sense of ownership.

“You either experienced it firsthand,” said Amanda Spielman, 30, a graphic designer from Jackson Heights, Queens, who was in the city, “or you didn’t.”

Others describe that sense differently, but draw the line in the same place.

“I think for the people that seen it on TV, it is more painful than for the people who saw it here,” said Paolo Gonzalez, 29, who manages a parking lot under the Brooklyn Bridge and who saw the attack. “For the other people it was real. If you was here, when the buildings came down the only thing you were thinking was, ‘Run.’ ”

Across the line, the new arrivals recognize that sense of ownership.

“I’ve been told that I just don’t get it and that I could never understand what it was like to be there in New York on Sept. 11,” said Laura Bassett, 27, who moved to the city from North Carolina after 2001. “I hate that five years later, people still debate which bystander is allowed to be more upset, the New Yorker or the American.”

The line emerges perhaps most powerfully around the fallen towers, 2.06 acres of concrete known as ground zero. Because of the line, the site is a paradox, an emotional contradiction, a mass grave and a tourist attraction.

Some people feel so strongly about the place they cannot agree on an arrangement for listing the names of the dead; others feel so strongly about the place that they make sure to visit between Radio City Music Hall and the Statue of Liberty. Between those emotional poles is a middle ground, and the line runs through its center.

“People who moved to New York, everyone wanted to go down and see it,” said Dede Minor, 51, a real estate broker who was in her office in Midtown on the day of the attack. “For New Yorkers, it was too real.”

Jose Martias, 57, a construction worker who was drinking coffee near the East River when the attack began, said he knew why the newcomers visit the site.

“They don’t understand it so they go down there to see the hole,” Mr. Martias said. “It’s an attraction to them, like going to the circus.”

But across the line there is genuine emotional curiosity, a feeling that people in less cynical times used to call empathy.

“I’d didn’t think I’d be that affected,” said Leah Hamilton, 24, a logistics consultant who moved to Manhattan from Washington State last year. “But when I went to ground zero, it was the first time I’ve felt an emotional reaction like that to something I wasn’t a part of. You feel the energy and you could feel the sadness.”

The line can reach into the future, forging perceptions of New York and its destiny. Some new arrivals speak of the attack as a reason to come to the city.

“We felt like there was a lot of energy here,” said Meg Glasser, 26, a student who moved to the East Village from Boston this year. “We wanted to be a part of it in some way.”

But across the line, that sense of energy is tempered by standards for comparison.

“I know people who have been here a year or two, and they find New York fantastic,” said Father Bernard, 67, a Roman Catholic monk who was born in Brooklyn and who goes by only that name. “They’re right, but they didn’t know the New York before.”

The line reaches into the past as well, dividing memories. Each generation tells the next where they were when the bombs fell on Pearl Harbor, when the Kennedys and Martin Luther King were killed or when a space shuttle exploded, but a major act of destruction in a major American city creates more firsthand accounts.

Psychological studies suggest those accounts have played a role in drawing the line. After the attack, a group of academic researchers interviewed 1,500 people, including 550 in New York City, to gauge memories of detail, said Elizabeth Phelps, a professor of psychology and neural science at New York University. Proximity to Lower Manhattan during the attack, Dr. Phelps said, “increases your confidence in your memories, and your accuracy as well.”

In a separate study, the researchers measured activity in parts of the brain connected to memory. With verbal cues, subjects were asked to conjure visions of the terror attack and of personal events from the summer of 2001. Only half registered a difference in neural activity.

“Those who did show a difference were, on average, in Washington Square Park,” Dr. Phelps said. “Those who didn’t were, on average, in Midtown.”

Among those who have come to the city since 2001, the line dividing memories is undisputed.

“I had been there as a tourist to the World Trade Center, so I have memories,” said Marielle Solan, 22, a photographer who moved to the city from Delaware this year. “But obviously I can’t have any sense of what it was like. Every Sept, 11, you get a sense of fear and depression, but in terms of actual visceral reactions, I don’t really have that.”

The new arrivals have found a conspicuous void of shared memory.

“I’m amazed because it was such a big event, and people never mention it,” said Deenah Vollmer, 20, who moved to the city last year. “When you do mention it, everyone has these crazy intense stories.”

Across the line, many of those who lived in the city hold their memories close.

“The people I already knew know my stories from that day, so there’s no need to repeat them,” said Ms. Spielman, the graphic designer. “The new people I’ve met don’t ask me. It’s not something I bring up.”

But each year the calendar brings it up. Alexandria Lambert, 28, who works as an administrative assistant, sees the line run through the center of her office. Each year, a co-worker who witnessed the attack asks for the day off, and each year a boss who did not declines the request.

“His point of view is, ‘Don’t let it get you down,’ ” Ms. Lambert said, “but she just doesn’t want to be here.”

Reporting for this article was contributed by Sarah Garland, Kate Hammer, Colin Moynihan and Conrad Mulcahy.


Wednesday, September 06, 2006

Butter wins again

My grandmother Lillian never saw the value of using margarine. "Butter's better" she would quip. Now we know butter is also HEALTHIER. Enjoy.

Personal Health

Butter or Margarine? First, Study the Label

Published: September 5, 2006

The culinary battle between butter and margarine has raged for decades, but, it turns out, for the wrong reason. We now know that the partly hydrogenated fatty acids in margarine and many processed foods are harmful to health — more harmful, in fact, than the saturated fat in butter.


Stuart Bradford

Readers’ Opinions

Forum: Fitness and Nutrition

This does not mean butter is healthier. But it does mean consumers need to pay far more attention to the fat content of all the foods they consume, both at home and in restaurants. The process commonly used to convert liquid vegetable oil into a fat with the consistency of butter, the baking qualities of lard and a long shelf life forms trans fatty acids, which every diner and snacker should avoid.

Gram for gram, trans fats, as they are commonly called, are more hazardous to the heart than the saturated fats that damage arteries. Like saturated fats, they raise the “bad,” or L.D.L., cholesterol that can become glued to arteries; but unlike saturated fats, they also lower the “good” H.D.L. cholesterol that clears away these harmful deposits.

Butter is not a heart-healthy choice because its saturated fat far outweighs the trans fat in traditional stick margarines. Also, butter contains cholesterol, which can raise blood levels of cholesterol in some people; margarine, which is made from vegetable sources, does not.

The good news is that a Food and Drug Administration ruling, which took effect in January, requires food companies to list the amount of trans fats on the nutrition label of every package. As a result, most companies have switched the fats they use so they can say “no trans fats” on the label.

The bad news is that some substitutions — to tropical oils like palm, palm kernel and coconut — are reintroducing more heart-damaging saturated fats to American diets and causing environmental devastation in several countries where palm and coconut trees grow.

Furthermore, consumers who use the “no trans fats” label proclamation as their buying guide can still end up buying a lot of what nutritionists call junk foods. And the F.D.A. ruling does not apply to foods sold in restaurants, bakeries, takeout and other retail food outlets where unsuspecting consumers could be loading up on harmful trans fats.

That prompted the New York Department of Health and Mental Hygiene in March to ask the city’s 20,000 restaurants and 14,000 food suppliers to eliminate partly hydrogenated oils from kitchens and provide foods and food products free of industrially produced trans fatty acids.

What Trans Fats Do

The health concerns about trans fats go far beyond the effects on blood cholesterol. In a report in the June issue of The Journal of the American Dietetic Association, researchers led by Katherine M. Phillips, a biochemist at Virginia Polytechnic Institute, reviewed what is known about trans fats and their alternatives.

The “trans” in trans fatty acids refers to the biochemical configuration of the fat molecule. Natural polyunsaturated fatty acids in vegetable oils have a “cis” conformation: the hydrogen atoms in each double bond are on the same side. But the processes used in partial hydrogenation results in some double bonds with a “trans” conformation: hydrogen atoms on opposite sides of each double bond.

This little biochemical switch turns out to have potentially devastating health effects. In addition to raising bad cholesterol (especially the small L.D.L. particles that stick to blood vessels) and lowering good cholesterol, trans fatty acids raise blood levels of triglycerides and lipoprotein (a), which raise cardiovascular risk.

But that is not all. Trans fatty acids, when compared with cis-unsaturated fats, also raise blood levels of substances like C-reactive protein that are markers of bodywide inflammation and cellular dysfunction, also linked to heart and blood vessel disease.

Trans fats can interfere with the metabolism of essential fatty acids, the synthesis of healthful omega-3 fatty acids and the balance of prostaglandins, disrupting protection against blood clots. And high intakes of trans fats may cause insulin resistance, a marker of type 2 diabetes.

In a recent review in The New England Journal of Medicine on the relationship between trans fats and heart disease, even low levels of trans fats in the diet — a mere 1 percent to 2 percent of calories per day — were linked to a substantially increased risk of heart disease. In studies of 140,000 individuals, consuming 2 percent of calories as trans fats resulted in a 23 percent increase in heart disease.

In 1983, scientists at the United States Department of Agriculture estimated that the average American consumed 8 grams of trans fats a day (that’s 3.6 percent of a 2,000-calorie diet), with 85 percent coming from foods containing partly hydrogenated oils and the rest from trans fats naturally present in meat and dairy products.

The low levels of trans fats in meats and dairy products result from hydrogenation by microbes in the gut of ruminant animals (cows, sheep and goats). In addition, small amounts of trans fats are formed when vegetable oils are refined at high temperatures.

A more recent estimate based on mid-1990’s data by the F.D.A. put the average trans fat consumption by adults at 5.8 grams a day. The main contributors of these fats were cakes and related products (23.8 percent), margarine (16.5 percent), cookies and crackers (9.8 percent), fried potatoes (8.3 percent), chips and snacks (4.8 percent) and household shortenings (4.3 percent).

Choosing Healthier Foods

The new food label rule exempts products with less than 0.5 gram of trans fatty acid per serving, which can list the amount as zero per serving. But if someone eats, say, four servings of the food instead of one, as many do, the amount of trans fats consumed can have a significant effect.

The only way to know if a zero listing really means zero is to check the ingredients list. If partly hydrogenated oil is an ingredient, there is some trans fat in the food. (Fully hydrogenated oils, listed only as “hydrogenated,” do not contain trans fats. Rather, these fats are saturated.)

Furthermore, the listing of trans fats is meaningful only if consumers read the label and select foods that have no trans fats and no partly hydrogenated oils.

If you want to avoid trans fats when eating out or buying takeout, you have to ask how a food was prepared. Ask what cooking fats were used, including the oils in salad dressings. The New England Journal authors said that to avoid adverse health effects, “complete or near-complete avoidance of industrially produced trans fats” is necessary.

To protect heart health, you would be wise, as well, to avoid foods made with tropical oils (palm, palm kernel and coconut), which contain saturated fatty acids.

Soft and liquid margarines have little or no trans fats. And American producers are working hard to develop alternative methods of producing shelf-stable vegetable oils, which should be on the shelf in the next year or so.

McDonald’s in Denmark, where there is a legal limit on industrially produced trans fats in foods (less than 2 percent), manages to serve food without these harmful fats. Why not here? Denmark has shown that eliminating partly hydrogenated vegetable oils from foods in stores and restaurants does not result in a loss of palatability, availability or quality, or an increase in the cost or consumption of saturated fats.

Tuesday, September 05, 2006

Kids learning from TV

When Toddlers Turn on the TV and Actually Learn

Published: September 5, 2006

Yelling at the television used to be the domain of adults watching “Jeopardy!” But young children have become the real pros.


Illustrations by Nola Lopez

INTERACTIVE? ALMOST The creators of “Blue’s Clues” say they try to involve their young viewers by simulating conversations that are realistic and child-centered.

Related

Web Links

Young Children's Use of Video as a Source of Socially Relevant Information (Child Development)

Television and Very Young Children (American Behavioral Scientist)

Sit down with a 3-year-old to watch “Blue’s Clues” or “Dora the Explorer,” and see the shouting erupt. Whenever a character faces the camera and asks a question, children out there in TV land are usually answering it.

Active engagement with television has been an antidote to criticism that the tube creates zombies. “Blue’s Clues,” which celebrated its 10th anniversary last month, has been credited with helping young children learn from the screen. Academic research has shown that viewers ages 3 to 5 score better on tests of problem solving than those who haven’t watched the show.

But what happens with children younger than 3? Should babies and toddlers be exposed to television at all? Is there any chance that they could actually learn from the screen? While debates rage among parents, pediatricians and critics of baby videos (think “Baby Einstein”), developmental psychologists are trying to apply some science to the question.

Experiments conducted at Vanderbilt University, described in the May/June issue of Child Development, offer some hints about toddlers. They showed that 24-month-olds are more apt to use information relayed by video if they consider the person on the screen to be someone they can talk to. Without that, the children seemed unable to act on what they had seen and heard.

The experiments compared two video experiences: One was based on a videotape. Watching it was similar to watching “Blue’s Clues”; the actor onscreen paused to simulate a conversation, but back-and-forth interaction with the viewer was impossible. A different group of children experienced two-way live video. It worked like a Web cam, with each side responding in real time.

Georgene L. Troseth and Megan M. Saylor, psychologists at Vanderbilt, and Allison H. Archer, an undergraduate student there, designed the study to find out if toddlers would learn from video if they considered the onscreen actors to be, as they put it, “social partners.”

The test hinged on a hiding game. First the 2-year-olds watched the video — either the tape or the live version. The screen showed a person hiding a stuffed animal, Piglet, in a nearby room, often under a table or behind a couch. When the video ended, the children were asked to retrieve Piglet. Those who saw the recorded video had some trouble. They found him only 35 percent of the time. Children in the other group succeeded about 69 percent of the time, a rate similar to face-to-face interaction.

Does this mean that TV programs that simulate interaction are doing nothing for kids? Not necessarily, the researchers say. A few of the children in the recorded video group were especially responsive to the games and pauses, and they were the few children in that group who retrieved the toy.

“We found that if children gave evidence of treating the video as a social partner,” Dr. Troseth said, “they will use the information.”

Their article referred specifically to “Blue’s Clues,” saying the show appeared to be “on the right track” — a point that, not surprisingly, thrilled creators of the program. Alice Wilder, the show’s director of research, said each script was tested in live settings with children to make sure that the show’s hosts — a young man named Steve in the early seasons and the current one, Joe — appear to be having realistic, child-centered conversations with viewers.

Developmental psychologists say the Vanderbilt research offers an intriguing clue to a phenomenon called the “video deficit.” Toddlers who have no trouble understanding a task demonstrated in real life often stumble when the same task is shown onscreen. They need repeated viewings to figure it out. This deficit got its name in a 2005 article by Daniel R. Anderson and Tiffany A. Pempek, psychologists at the University of Massachusetts, who reviewed literature on young children and television.

Child-development experts say the deficit confirms the age-old wisdom that real-life interactions are best for babies. Parents can be assured, they say, that their presence trumps the tube.

But psychologists still want to get to the bottom of what might explain the difference. Is it the two-dimensionality of the screen? Do young children have some innate difficulty in remembering information transmitted as symbols? “It’s definitely still a puzzle, and we’re trying to figure out the different components to it,” said Rachel Barr, a psychologist at Georgetown University who specializes in infant memory. She and Harlene Hayne at the University of Otago in New Zealand published some early evidence of the video deficit in 1999.

The Vanderbilt research offers the possibility that the more socially engaging a video is, the more likely the deficit will disappear. But Dr. Troseth and other psychologists stress that in-person connections with parents are by far a child’s best teacher. No word yet on whether that includes those moments when harried parents are so distracted that TV characters are more responsive than they are.

Monday, September 04, 2006

What's LOVE got to do with it?

This Can’t Be Love

Published: September 5, 2006

Across the eastern United States, a gruesome ritual is in full swing. The praying mantis and its relative, the Chinese mantis, are in their courtship season. A male mantis approaches a female, flapping his wings and swaying his abdomen. Leaping on her back, he begins to mate. And quite often, she tears off his head.


Catherine Chalmers

The Approach Mantises prepare to mate. With luck the female may not be hungry. More Photos »

Time Wimborne/Reuters/Corbis

Death Wish A male redback spider climbing onto a female to mate. More Photos >

Gregory Ochocki/Photo Researchers

Sexual cannibalism has also been reported in the horned nudibranch. More Photos >

David Scharf/Photo Researchers

Sexual cannibalism has been reported in the midge as well. Some believe that natural selection or perhaps simply appetite is behind the practice. More Photos >

The female mantis devours the head of the still-mating male and then moves on to the rest of his body. “If you put a pair together and come back later, you’ll just find the wings of the male and no other evidence he was ever there,” said William Brown, an evolutionary biologist at the State University of New York in Fredonia.

Sexual cannibalism has fascinated biologists ever since Darwin. It is not limited to mantises, but is also found in other invertebrates, including spiders, midges and perhaps horned nudibranchs.

Biologists have debated how this behavior has evolved in these species. Some have suggested that sexual cannibalism is just a result of a voracious female appetite. But experiments have also suggested that it is a strategy that females use to select the best fathers for their offspring.

Other scientists have found evidence that males may have had a role in the evolution of cannibalism. By surrendering themselves to their mates, males increase their reproductive success. Still other scientists have proposed that males actually go to great lengths to minimize their risk of being eaten.

As scientists look more closely at sexual cannibalism in many species, the emerging consensus is that all of these theories may be right. Different evolutionary pressures produce sexual cannibalism in different species.

“It’s not something that lends itself to a single, simple explanation,” said Mark Elgar of the University of Melbourne.

Sexual cannibalism became a hot topic of debate among biologists in 1984. Scientists from Cornell and the University of Texas at Austin proposed that it evolved because the males of some species could get an evolutionary advantage from being eaten. Their bodies could nourish the mothers of their offspring, raising the odds that those offspring would successfully hatch and grow up to produce their own offspring, thus carrying on the father’s genes.

The late Harvard biologist Stephen Jay Gould attacked this argument, calling it a prime example of how biologists had become “overzealous about the power and range of selection by trying to attribute every significant form and behavior to its direct action.”

Dr. Gould argued that sexual cannibalism was too rare to be significant. It is possible, he said, that females eat their mates simply because they mistake them for prey.

Subsequent research refuted parts of Dr. Gould’s argument. Some sexual cannibals, including female Chinese mantises, actually eat a lot of males. “One study estimated that 63 percent of the diet of females are male mantids,” Dr. Brown said. “So they’re the main food source.”

Other scientists have demonstrated that males can increase their chances of passing on their genes if they cooperate in their own death.

Male Australian redback spiders court females for up to eight hours by plucking the strands of their web. Once a male starts to mate, he promptly somersaults onto her fangs. He continues to mate as she feeds on him. In some cases, the male crawls a short distance away, courts the female again, and then mates a second time. He flips onto her fangs, and by the end of the second mating he is dead.

Male redback spiders benefit from cannibalism, but not because they can become food for their mates. Instead, Dr. Maydianne Andrade of the University of Toronto has found that males that are cannibalized mate more than twice as long as noncannibalized males. They also father twice as many offspring with a female that mates with other males.

“We’ve replicated the results three times — it’s definitely going on,” Dr. Andrade said.

Cannibalism provides males extra time to put a plug in a female’s sperm receptacle, Dr. Andrade’s research suggests. The plug prevents other males from fertilizing the female, thus raising the odds that the first male’s sperm will.

“It has to be placed quite precisely for it to function as a sperm plug,” Dr. Andrade said.

Male redback spiders, which have two sexual organs, also have adaptations to let them survive cannibalism long enough to mate twice. Female spiders have two receptacles, each of which must be fertilized by separate male organs. If a male redback dies before he has a chance to fertilize the second receptacle, his reproductive success plummets by half.

Dr. Andrade and her student Jeff Stoltz noticed that male redback spiders develop a pinched abdomen before they mate. “Imagine putting a belt around it and cinching it tight,” Dr. Andrade said. “It’s really striking, and it develops long before the males even touch the females.”

To understand why the spiders developed this belt, the scientists delivered wounds to male redbacks to mimic female cannibalism. They found that males that had developed the constriction survived longer and mated more successfully than males that had not.

The constriction may help males survive by pushing the heart and other vital organs away from the female’s fangs. It may also reduce the flow of fluids out of the spider’s body.

Scientists have found other species in which males encourage their own cannibalism. One remarkable twist on this strategy is seen in a species of orb-weaving spiders. The males suddenly die as they mate. The male’s death may be a strategy for preventing other males from mating with the female. In death, its sexual organ becomes stuck in the female’s receptacle. Even if she feeds on the rest of his body, the organ remains behind, preventing her from receiving more sperm.

Some scientists are now investigating what sort of evolutionary pressures cause males to go along with their own demise. In some species, males have very few opportunities to mate, while each female may mate with multiple males. For these desperate males, the benefits of sacrificing themselves may outweigh the loss of future opportunities to mate. Dr. Andrade describes the strategy this way: “If you don’t have any other shot at it, do what you can now.”

Recently, Dr. Brown of SUNY Fredonia set out to test whether male Chinese mantises are complicit in their own deaths. Females clearly eat a lot of male mantids, but that does not necessarily mean that the males benefit. Dying while mating with one female robs them of the chance to mate with other females.

Dr. Brown decided to observe whether males did anything to increase their odds of survival during mating. Since hungrier females are more likely to eat their mates, he reasoned that males might approach hungry females differently from fed ones.

“We predicted that if the male is complicit, he’s just going to march into her jaws,” Dr. Brown said. “But if the male does not want to become her meal, then he should avoid the risk of being eaten.”

Dr. Brown and his undergraduate student Jonathan Lelito (now a graduate student at the University of Pittsburgh) placed males into containers with females. In some cases, the females had just feasted on crickets, and in other cases they were ravenous.

Male mantises responded very differently to hungry females and to full ones. They were more eager to approach full ones than hungry ones. When they did approach hungry females, they jumped onto their mates from farther away, possibly to lessen the chance of the female grabbing him.

Dr. Brown and Mr. Lelito also found that male mantises also took longer to jump off hungry females. Females sometimes grab males as they dismount, and so the males may have waited out of caution.

“It’s clearly a case of sexual conflict,” Dr. Brown said. “Males are not willing partners.”

The scientists report their findings in the August issue of American Naturalist.

“This really is the first good clean test of the idea that males are in conflict with females over this,” Dr. Andrade said.

Like mantises, males of some other species appear to go to great lengths not to be eaten. Male golden orb spiders can reduce their chances of being eaten by jumping onto females as they are eating something else. If they survive mating, they can increase their reproductive success by standing guard over their females and driving away other males.

Female hunger may be an important part of sexual cannibalism, but females may also use it for their own evolutionary benefit. In some species, they appear to choose which males they will cannibalize and how long they will let males mate before eating them. These choices may let the females exert some control over which males will father their offspring.

Dr. Brown also wonders whether female mantises have evolved ways to lure males to eat. Female mantises depend so much on male mantises for their diet that natural selection may favor females that can attract more males. Dr. Brown notes that male mantises are drawn to females by the odor of pheromones. He is investigating whether female mantises use the pheromones as a trap, rather than an honest signal.

“The most intriguing situation would be a mated female that’s hungry,” Dr. Brown said. “Does she boost her pheromones, not because she needs sperm but because she needs food?”

Sunday, September 03, 2006

My Philosophy of Living Every Day

This guy (Steve) has the right idea. I agree with almost everything he writes here. Those of you who know me best can easily imagine me sayng these same things.


Many years ago an old friend and I were discussing the meaning of life. He said, “I don’t think the point of life is to accomplish a certain level of external success. I believe we’re actually here to acquire and enjoy experiences.”

That conversation took place about 15 years ago, and this idea has remained with me ever since. It’s a Zen-like philosophy because experiences imply living in the present while accomplishments dwell in the past or future. Reading this particular article is an experience, but you probably wouldn’t consider it an accomplishment… although reading some of my longer articles might qualify. ;)

We’ve been socially conditioned to value accomplishments and events more than everyday experiences. Graduation day is more important than some random Tuesday in the middle of the semester. The day you get hired or promoted is more important than an uneventful work day. Your wedding day is more important than the day you saw a forgettable movie.

Accomplishments and events are certainly experiences too, but most experiences don’t qualify as either. You’ll likely spend most of your life experiencing non-events. It would be amazing if your accomplishments amounted to even 1% of your experiences. Saturation tends to reduce the occurrence of salient events. The time you spoke your first intelligible word was a major accomplishment, but speaking that same word isn’t such a grand achievement today. Regardless of how much you accomplish in your lifetime, you’ll probably still perceive most of your days as typical, normal, or routine.

If you’re going to spend most of your time experiencing rather than accomplishing, then perhaps it makes sense to focus on the quality of your daily experiences and not merely on the heights of your accomplishments. It’s nice to have a truly fantastic day where you accomplish something wonderful, but what about your normal days?

When you realize most of your life will be consumed by normal days rather than extraordinary ones, you may feel motivated to raise the overall quality of these normal days.

In the pursuit of a better normal day, here are ten changes I made that yielded strong positive results. Hopefully this list will trigger some ideas you’ll be able to apply as well. The overall concept is far more important than my particular menu of habits.

1. Getting an early start. Last year I successfully conditioned the habit of getting up at 5:00am every morning. Later I experimented with polyphasic sleep but stopped after 5.5 months when I felt it wasn’t serving me well enough. Today I get up at 4:15am every morning, including weekends. I used to be a night owl, but I love the positive effect that rising early has had on my life. As you can imagine, the initial adaptation was very challenging, but like most ingrained habits, it’s trivially easy to maintain. Getting an early start to every day makes me feel energetic, alert, and productive. I have the time and energy to do things I couldn’t previously do. This has been one of the most empowering changes I’ve ever made because it yields tangible rewards every single day. If I could go back in time and install a new habit in my early 20s, this would be it. If this habit interests you, be sure to read How to Become an Early Riser and How to Get Up Right Away When Your Alarm Goes Off.

2. Physical exercise. I’ve gone through a variety of different workout patterns over the years. My current pattern is to hit the gym for 60-90 minutes first thing in the morning. I do three days of cardio workouts and four days of weight-training each week. If I feel burnt out or if my progress slows to a crawl (symptoms of overtraining), I might take a day or two off or substitute a long walk instead. This habit yields massive benefits. Perhaps the most noticeable is that my mental clarity is much greater, and I can concentrate deeply for hours at a time. I think the minimum recommendation of exercising 20 minutes 3x per week is way too little. For me the major benefits don’t really kick in until I do at least 150 minutes of aerobic/cardio exercise per week — below that level I tend to stagnate instead of seeing my fitness level improve. This habit combines nicely with being an early riser, since I return home from my workouts before most people are awake.

3. Audio learning. While exercising I normally listen to personal development audio programs and podcasts. Sometimes I also listen while doing routine physical tasks like cooking or driving. I started this habit during college, and it has served me well for the past decade and a half. It doesn’t consume any extra time to do this, and it makes physical tasks more enjoyable. I use an iPod Nano, a major improvement over the Walkman cassette player I used in college. I also bought a $30 FM transmitter last year, so I can play my iPod on my car radio too. By listening to inspirational and educational material every day, especially during my morning workout, I not only learn new ideas I can apply, but I also feel more positive throughout the day.

4. Meditation. After my morning workout and shower, I usually meditate for about 30 minutes. I prefer active visualization as opposed to trying to turn off all thought, although I sometimes enjoy the latter too. If the kids are already waking up when I get home, I delay the meditation until later in the morning, but I almost always do it before starting my workday. I get some of my best ideas while meditating, and I also use this time to visualize my goals and intentions. Plus I enjoy it. I don’t recall having any illnesses in the past year, so perhaps the combo of daily exercise and meditation keeps my immune system strong (both are known to be significant immune boosters). The rest of my family has gone through a few illnesses that haven’t touched me.

5. Relaxing workspace. Since I spend the bulk of each workday in my home office, I’ve fashioned it into a peaceful and enjoyable place to work. With its trickling fountain, bamboo plants, scented candles, and new age music, it serves as my private sanctuary. When I start work each day, I go through a 60-second ritual of turning on the fountain, lighting a few candles, and playing some music. I typically feel very relaxed and peaceful throughout the day, regardless of the type of work I’m doing. Transform your workspace into your favorite place to be, and watch the positive effect it has on your productivity. I’ve designed mine primarily for relaxation and focus, but you can design it around any state you wish. Use trial and error to see how various changes make you feel, and keep the ones that produce positive results. The basic idea is that when you feel good, you’ll be more productive. For details on how to improve your workspace, read Creating a Productive Workspace.

6. Self-employment. I have to credit self-employment as a major factor in the quality of my normal days. Being in control of my time is wonderful, and I can’t imagine ever wanting a regular job. If you think about it logically, isn’t it a bit silly that people think having a job is more secure than owning your own business? Maybe that’s true when you’re just launching the business, but once the business is stable and profitable, there’s no comparison. I can’t be fired or laid off, and I start out at the top, so there’s no need to worry about promotions. If I ever need money fast, there are plenty of short-term value-producing ideas I can implement in a weekend to generate extra cash. I can work on whatever interests me without having to request permission from some authority figure. Earning money based on your results is much more flexible and less risky than earning money based on your time. The biggest risk isn’t going broke; if you go broke, you’ll recover soon enough — that’s really no big deal. The far greater risk is that you’ll miss opportunities, and that’s what most employees do every single day; their ripest value-generating ideas die on the vine. No one benefits when that happens. Even if you’re an employee, I highly recommend starting your own small business. It’s important to have an outlet where you can fully express your greatest value and get paid fairly for it too. For specific advice on how to do that, listen to Podcast #006 - How to Make Money Without a Job and Podcast #009 - Kick-start Your Own Business. If you visit the audio section of the site, you can play them directly through your browser.

7. Effective communication management. Due to the popularity of this web site and the personal nature of its topic, the sheer volume of feedback I receive can be overwhelming at times. At first I diligently kept on top of it, believing that every query deserved a response, but soon I questioned the wisdom of that approach. My long-term goals started to fall by the wayside as the influx of communication became dominant. I had to decide where my primary loyalty should be: with the individual readers who request help or with my ultimate vision. It became clear that I couldn’t justify spending hours every day processing email. I know some people run their lives through their email inbox, but through trial and error I’ve learned that approach doesn’t work for me because excessive communication inhibits my ability to concentrate and knocks me off course too easily. Consequently, I severely limit the amount of time I spend on email. Helping someone via email is a good use of my time, but it’s definitely not the best. In order to write this article you’re reading now, dozens of emails I’ve received will go unanswered, but this article will be seen by thousands. But more importantly I’ve noticed that when I limit the influx of external communication, I’m better able to hear the subtle guidance of my inner voice. If you have a problem with focus and clarity in your life, could it be that you’re getting bounced around by an overload of communication?

8. Reading. The simple habit of reading every day keeps my self-education moving forward. It’s one of the reasons I’m able to churn out article after article without experiencing writer’s block. I favor books because the quality and organization is usually superior to what’s found online. 9 out of 10 books I read are non-fiction, but occasionally I enjoy a good fiction book too. I quite enjoyed Piers Anthony’s Incarnations of Immortality series.

9. Deep conversation. My wife and I have daily conversations about topics such as spirituality, the meaning of life, and the best ways for us to serve the greater good. Since we work from home on weekdays and often go out on weekends, we have no shortage of time together. I enjoy talking to my wife more than anyone else, and I feel fortunate to have found a woman who shares my passion for learning and exploration. While many people aren’t into questioning what lies beyond the physical world on a daily basis, I find this practice extremely worthwhile. It keeps me from getting sucked back into the socially conditioned patterns of fear and worry. It doesn’t have to be your spouse, but I highly recommend finding a partner with whom you can discuss your most important life issues in an intelligent and supportive manner. Many people crave this deep connection, but they allow fear to hold them back.

10. Journaling. I’ve written about this previously in Journaling as a Problem-Solving Tool. I keep two kinds of journals. First, I use a computer journal to do long-term planning, problem-solving, and asking and answering personal development questions. Sometimes my personal journal entries become seeds for future articles. Thanks to its search capabilities, I can quickly look up solutions to previous problems I’ve encountered. Secondly, I use a spiral notebook as my daily work journal. I write my daily to-do lists in that journal, and I make notes throughout the day as I work. About once I week I process the paper journal items back into my master to-do list. This ensures that ideas I get throughout the day are considered in light of my long-term goals, so I don’t let great ideas fall through the cracks, but nor do I get knocked off course by random thoughts throughout the day. Both forms of journaling allow me to see what real progress I’m making in my personal and business growth.

The pattern to these habits is that they serve to keep me conscious. They empower me with the energy, resources, and awareness to pursue my greatest aspirations without slipping into low-awareness living. This framework enables me to choose how I spend each day instead of having those decisions made by forces outside my control. None of these practices are particularly complicated, but most of them took a serious effort to install. However, once they’ve been conditioned, they run on autopilot. Now I just take them for granted as my current baseline.

Decide now to install just one new habit that will change your life for the better. Then immediately begin a 30-day trial to condition it, and do whatever it takes to make it to day 30. If your past efforts have fizzled, then use the strategy of Overwhelming Force to ensure that you succeed this time. The ultimate payoff for this temporary effort is enormous. Once you install several new habits, your normal days will become far more extraordinary.

Saturday, September 02, 2006

School Anxiety

Personal Health

Help for the Child Who Says No to School

Published: August 29, 2006

James, a tall, bright, personable 12-year-old, had been successful socially, athletically and scholastically all through elementary school.


Stuart Bradford

Ask Science

Jane E. Brody answered select reader questions regarding this article. Read her answers.

More Ask Science »

Related Web Link

Readers’ Opinions

Forum: Parenting

But everything fell apart when he had to move on to a large centralized middle school. Never a morning person, James now had to get up at 6 a.m. instead of 7:30 to catch the bus. Once at school, he had trouble finding his way around and arrived late for many of his classes. Rather than asking for reasons, which included being bullied and hit by several older boys, his teachers simply gave him late marks and detention.

James’s grades plummeted, and his feelings about school crashed with them. He couldn’t sleep at night. He started missing school a few days a week, then found himself unable to go at all. His parents were understanding and spoke to school authorities about his problems, but nothing anyone did seemed to make things better, not even disconnecting the television and computer to reduce the “rewards” of staying home.

Beginning the Turnaround

A psychological evaluation led to a diagnosis of a serious anxiety disorder set off by the abrupt change in school environment. Medication and 18 months at a therapeutic school, where James made steady progress, turned the situation around.

He did not return to the public school that terrified him, but he is thriving in a small private school where he made the National Honor Roll. Refusal to go to school is not an uncommon problem; up to one-quarter of children do it at some point. While you might expect the problem to be severest when a child first enters school, it occurs most often and hits hardest at ages 10 to 13.

At this age children typically leave the nurturing environment of elementary school and are thrust into the chaos of middle school and the confusion of dealing with so many teachers.

Compound this with the hormonal upheaval. Many children suffer crises in self-confidence and self-image, often exacerbated by the fact that they go from being the oldest and most experienced students in the school to being the youngest and most inexperienced.

Bullying, often perpetrated by young teens who are unsure of themselves, is one of the most common causes of this problem, called school refusal behavior. “Children who are bullied or teased often become anxious about going to school,” said Michelle Kees, a psychologist at the University of Michigan. And some of them may avoid school because it is too hard for them or perhaps because they have an undiagnosed learning disability, she added.

Christopher A. Kearney, a psychologist at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, offered guidance on dealing with the situation in the August issue of The Journal of Family Practice. He told of Nathan, a 13-year-old who, like James, had trouble adjusting to middle school.

Though Nathan seemed fine on the weekends, during the school week he complained of headaches and stomachaches and told his parents he felt upset and nervous in school. He started going to school late, skipping classes and then skipping school altogether.

Common symptoms of school refusal behavior may include aggressive behavior, clinging to a parent or other adult, defiance, excessive assurance-seeking behavior, refusal to get up or get ready for school, running away from school or home, or having temper tantrums and crying.

Dr. Kearney described four circumstances that may prompt refusal to go to school:

Often in combination with underlying anxiety and depression, the child may be distressed by teachers, students, the bus, the cafeteria, the classrooms and transitions between classes.

The child may be trying to escape from distressing social situations or academic or athletic evaluations, including interacting with others or having to perform before others.

The child may be seeking attention from parents by staying home or wanting to go to work with a parent.

The child may find staying at home a rewarding experience that permits sleeping late, watching television, playing video games, or — especially for teenagers — engaging in delinquent behavior or substance abuse.

Risking the Consequences

Studies have shown that failing to deal with school refusal behavior can have serious consequences. In the short term, children who won’t go to school decline academically, become alienated from friends and cause family conflicts and financial and legal problems. Had James not gone willingly to the therapeutic school, the courts would have forced him to attend a school for delinquent children.

Common long-term problems listed by Dr. Kearney include dropping out of school, delinquent behaviors, economic deprivation, social isolation, marital problems and difficulty holding a job. Failing to receive the needed treatment can lead in later life to problems like anxiety disorder, depression or personality disorders.

Young children just starting school or returning to school after summer vacation may fear leaving their family or environment. In most cases, the initial hesitancy disappears as the child becomes familiar with the school and its rules and makes new friends. But a child with severe separation anxiety who is paralyzed by the fear of leaving home needs professional help, which should include teaching the parents how to cope effectively with the problem.

Discovering the Right Treatment

Often, the problem can be minimized before school opens by doing a walk-through of the school and classroom with children and arranging outings or visits with others in the same class. Once school opens, some teachers may allow parents to stay in class with their children for part of the day for a few days.

Dr. Kearney cautions that if a child has complaints like stomachaches, headaches or fatigue, as Nathan did, these should be checked out to be sure there is no underlying medical problem.

After Nathan’s pediatrician determined that the boy suffered from no underlying physical problems, a psychological exam revealed a generalized anxiety disorder. “He worried excessively about his social and academic performance at school,” and he showed physical signs related to anxiety, Dr. Kearney wrote.

If a psychological evaluation reveals a generalized anxiety disorder or depression, treatment is required, often with medication and professional counseling. Nathan was treated with a combination of sertraline (Zoloft) and anxiety management techniques, his parents received family therapy aimed at limiting the fun he had at home, and school staff members allowed him to gradually return to a full academic schedule.

Cognitive behavioral therapy, which emphasizes patterns of thinking, is especially effective in such cases.

For older children, techniques include relaxation training and breathing retraining to reduce the child’s anxiety, establishing routines and consequences for not attending school, and developing a contract that increases incentives for going to school and disincentives for staying home.

Friday, September 01, 2006

Brunch

SO many fine memories for me revolved around food, and BRUNCH has been very near the center of those memories for a long time now. Enjoy.

letter from new york: Notes from around town.

The Birth of BrunchWhy and how we eat at midday.


Illustration by Charlie Powell. Click image to expand.

"It started right here. This is the beginning of the brunch." This is Gary Greengrass, the owner of the Upper West Side delicatessen Barney Greengrass, known as "The Sturgeon King." A large, bald man who has run his grandfather's deli since 1983, Greengrass is sitting at a Formica table, his eyes trained on the customers coming through the door. At my behest, he is speculating that New York brunch as we know it began here on Amsterdam Avenue at 86th Street, amidst pickled herring, whitefish salad, and salmon with eggs and onions. "It sort of evolutionized from here," he says.

Six blocks south, at Sarabeth's at 80th Street, another New York restaurateur was laying down her claim. "I was the original brunch girl," says Sarabeth Levine. "I reactivated the eating of breakfast." Whereas Greengrass specializes in Jewish delicacies, Levine, who opened the first of her five New York locations in 1981, has a menu that tends toward porridges, vegetable and gruyere frittatas, and pumpkin waffles with sour cream, raisins, pumpkin seeds, and honey. "Before me, you had the local Greek diner or the corner bodega thing," Levine says. "But you didn't have a place to sit down and get hot cereal unless you went to the country."


Click Here!

Sunday brunch is so omnipresent in New York—extending uptown and downtown, upscale and downscale, and, these days, across all days and hours of the week—that its origins are necessarily hazy. Dozens of Manhattan restaurants can lay claim to inventing some part of brunch: You can trace the mythic origins of eggs Benedict, for example, to Delmonico's, a downtown steakhouse, and the Waldorf, in Midtown. But Sunday brunch's formative cauldron may be this otherwise unremarkable six-block stretch of Amsterdam on the Upper West Side. It is here that Sunday brunch acquired its defining characteristics, its casual manners.

Why Sunday? While it's tempting to see brunch as a secular ritual—a slow start for those coming to after nocturnal prowlings—there's an argument that it owes a great deal to American Jewry. Brunch, Gary Greengrass acknowledges, was a kind of Jewish alternative to church. Jewish families, with nothing much to do on Sunday mornings, would take a long, leisurely meal, with traditional foods like bagels, lox, and blintzes. Occasionally, they would take that meal out. (New York blue laws used to prohibit restaurants from being open on Sundays; Greengrass's grandfather, Barney, would gladly pay the fine.) These days, Barney Greengrass hosts its share of Jewish machers: Jerry Seinfeld, David Geffen, Richard Dreyfuss, and novelist Philip Roth, who, according to Gary Greengrass, is a brunch guy but not a Sunday brunch guy.

Barney Greengrass has been serving the same fare since it opened it 1908, but it wasn't until the early 1980s that brunch culture began to develop in New York. At that moment, Amsterdam above 79th Street wasn't an especially ripe piece of real estate. "It was terrible," says Sarabeth Levine. "My husband used to walk me to the bakery at 4:30 in the morning. There was a whole subculture of rats—whole families!" With money still transferring over from the Upper East Side, Amsterdam was a pre-gentrification mix of Columbia professors, artists, and bohemians—the sort of slackery Sunday-morning regulars who frequent brunch now.

It's easy to see brunch as a battle of wills: the restauranteurs, who want to keep the turnstiles moving, versus the customers, who would have the meal to take all afternoon. Brunch parties tend to arrive in increments, dressed like refugees, occasionally hungover, usually after increasingly irate calls from other patrons. ("Are you still in bed? Is someone there with you? Well, bring her, what do I care?") When the party finally coalesces on the sidewalk, they are informed by the host that they will have to wait for a table—both Barney Greengrass and Sarabeth's tend to have endless lines on Sundays. As Nora Ephron, a longtime Upper West Side resident, put it in e-mail the other day, "As far as I can tell, the essential quality of an Upper West Side brunch seems to consist of milling in a large group outside of a restaurant for over an hour."

Perhaps because of this extended preamble, diners feel entitled to a lethargic meal, kibitzing and peeling through the thick Sunday New York Times. To combat this, Barney Greengrass waiters are trained to be as warm as the restaurant's Formica tabletops, adhering to a policy of "get 'em in, get 'em down, get 'em well fed, and get 'em out." (You get your check whether you ask for it or not.) Sarabeth Levine says, "Do I want people in here for two hours? I don't think so! Breakfast isn't this big expensive thing. It's not like going out for dinner, where you sit for two hours, order wine, and run up a $250 bill. We don't want people nursing a muffin for two hours."

Other New York brunch traditions vary depending on taste. Brunch may be alcoholic or non-alcoholic. A general rule holds that if the previous night was well-oiled, a Bloody Mary or mimosa will be necessary. (Whereas if you were sober, you might wish to keep it that way.) Brunch often has a distinctly post-coital vibe. Either one is brunching with one's romantic partner from the previous evening, in which case a louche afterglow hangs in the air, or one is brunching with friends, in which case one is wondering aloud why a louche afterglow isn't hanging in the air.

The other thing about Sunday brunch is that it tends to be generational. In your 20s—mandatory, often twice a weekend. In your 30s and 40s—less so, unless you want to lug around a stroller. Fifties and beyond—again frequent, though starting at an earlier hour. It might as well be breakfast.

PRINT DISCUSS E-MAIL
Bryan Curtis is a Slate staff writer. You can e-mail him at curtisb@slate.com.
Illustration by Charlie Powell.
Join the Fray: our reader discussion forum
What did you think of this article?

Ciagrettes = addicition& death, quicker now

Nicotine Levels Rose 10 Percent in Last Six Years, Report Says

Published: August 31, 2006

BOSTON, Aug. 30 (AP) — The level of nicotine that smokers typically consume per cigarette has risen 10 percent in the past six years, making it harder to quit and easier to be addicted, said a report that the Massachusetts Department of Health released on Tuesday.

The study shows a steady increase in the amount of nicotine delivered to the smokers’ lungs regardless of brand, with overall yields increasing 10 percent.

Massachusetts is one of three states to require tobacco companies to submit information on nicotine testing to its specifications and is the sole state with data as far back as 1998.

The study found that the three most popular brands with young smokers, Marlboro, Newport and Camel, delivered significantly more nicotine than they did six years ago. Nicotine consumed in Kool, a popular menthol brand, rose 20 percent.

Jennifer Golisch, a spokeswoman for Phillip Morris USA, part of Altria and the largest cigarette maker and manufacturer of Marlboros, declined to comment. Reynolds American, manufacturer of Kools and Camels, also declined.

The study has always measured nicotine levels based on the way smokers use cigarettes, health officials said. That includes partly covering ventilation holes while smoking and taking longer puffs.

Traditional testing does not take habits into account and typically reports lower nicotine contents, researchers said.

“The amount of nicotine in a cigarette has increased steadily over the past six years,” the department said, indicating in its reports that the smoking habits simulated had not changed in that period.

Of the 179 brands tested in 2004, 93 percent fell into the highest range for nicotine. In 1998, 84 percent of 116 brands were in the highest range.

“We want health care providers to know that smokers are getting more nicotine than in the past and may need additional help in trying to quit,” the public health commissioner, Paul Cote Jr., said.

The report said that for all brands tested in 1998 and 2004 there was no significant difference in the total nicotine delivered among full flavor, medium, light or ultralight cigarettes.

The finding means that agencies trying to help smokers quit may have to adjust the strength of nicotine replacement therapies like nicotine patches and gums.###



Editorial

Raising Nicotine Doses, on the Sly


Published: August 31, 2006

While most of us thought the country was trying to curb smoking, and the rapacious habits of the tobacco companies, it turns out the industry has been sneakily making cigarettes more addictive.

Evidence of what looks like an increasingly desperate effort to hook new young smokers and prevent older ones from quitting has been uncovered by a Massachusetts law that forces tobacco companies to report test results showing how much nicotine is inhaled by typical smokers of their various brands.

This week, the Massachusetts Department of Public Health revealed that from 1998 through 2004, as public health campaigns were mounted to curb smoking, the manufacturers increased the amount of addictive nicotine delivered to the average smoker by 10 percent. Of 179 cigarette brands tested in 2004, an astonishing 166 brands fell into the state’s highest nicotine yield range, including 59 brands that the manufacturers had labeled “light” and 14 described as “ultra-light.” The three most popular brands chosen by young smokers — Marlboro, Newport and Camel — all delivered significantly more nicotine as the years passed. Virtually all brands were found to deliver a high enough nicotine dose to cause heavy dependence.

This trend has escaped notice because the standard government test uses a smoking machine that fails to mimic real-life smoking. A manufacturer, for example, can design a cigarette that will score low in nicotine delivery to the machine by placing tiny ventilation holes in the filter to dilute the smoke. But in real life a smoker will often cover the vents with lips or fingers, thereby inhaling a higher dose of nicotine. When Massachusetts required the manufacturers to use what it considered a more realistic method, the nicotine yields were more than twice those found on the standard test. The Massachusetts approach may not be perfect, but it is surely a lot more accurate than the traditional test, which virtually all independent experts consider deficient.

It is stunning to discover how easily this rogue industry was able to increase public consumption of nicotine without anyone knowing about it until Massachusetts blew the whistle. The Massachusetts report bears out the conclusions of a federal judge in Washington, who recently concluded that the companies have designed cigarettes to produce low nicotine readings on the standard test while delivering enough nicotine to create and sustain addiction. It is long past time for Congress to bring this damaging and deceitful industry under federal regulatory control. If the companies had to justify to the Food and Drug Administration why they should be allowed to increase the nicotine inhaled by smokers, you can bet they wouldn’t even try.###